• Home
  • Investing
  • Global
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Tech/AI
  • Lifestyle
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Investing
  • Global
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Tech/AI
  • Lifestyle
  • About Us
  • Contact
LOGIN
Monday, May 11, 2026
Top Posts
Costco: Compounding Power of Trust and Discipline
Uber: The Rulebreaker’s Playbook
Google: Search Box to Empires
Y Combinator: Accelerator or University
Investing Guidance – Oct 24, 2025
Investing Guidance – Oct 17, 2025
Investing Guidance – Nov 19, 2025
Intel: The Traitorous Eight
Investing Guidance – Nov 12, 2025
Investing Guidance – Nov 7, 2025
SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTERS
  • Home
  • Investing
  • Global
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Tech/AI
  • Lifestyle
  • About Us
  • Contact
Copyright 2021 - All Right Reserved
Windows 11 is getting a macOS-like speed boost
Tech/AI

Windows 11 is getting a macOS-like speed boost

by admin May 11, 2026
written by admin

Microsoft is using dynamic CPU scaling to speed up the Start menu, app opening times, and more.

Microsoft is using dynamic CPU scaling to speed up the Start menu, app opening times, and more.

May 11, 2026, 11:12 AM UTC
Windows 11 logo seen on a booth at Comic Con event...
Windows 11 logo seen on a booth at Comic Con event...
Tom Warren
Tom Warren is a senior correspondent and author of Notepad, who has been covering all things Microsoft, PC, and tech for over 20 years.

Microsoft is currently testing a new speed boost feature in Windows 11 that is designed to improve app launch times and make things like the Start menu feel more responsive. The feature, which is reportedly called “Low Latency Profile,” will ramp up CPU frequency in short bursts to improve the speed of menus, flyouts, apps, and more — much like how macOS handles similar tasks.

Windows 11 testers have been trying out the new unannounced feature over the past week, and noticing significant speed improvements launching File Explorer or the Start menu, as well as apps like Outlook, the Microsoft Store, and Paint.

Windows Central reports that this new boost mode can result in up to 40 percent faster app times for Microsoft’s own apps, and up to 70 percent faster for the Start menu and context menus throughout Windows 11. While the early results look promising, some online commentators have criticized Microsoft for using CPU bursts to improve its operating system, drawing the attention of a Microsoft executive.

Scott Hanselman, vice president of technical staff for CoreAI, GitHub, and Windows, defended Microsoft’s speed boost changes to Windows 11 over the weekend, pointing out in a post on X that “your smartphone already does this” and that Microsoft isn’t cheating by boosting CPU clocks temporarily. Microsoft is using a common practice, used by macOS and Linux, to dynamically scale a CPU to prioritize interactive tasks. “Apple does this and y’all love it,” said Hanselman. “Let Windows cook.”

Microsoft’s latest speed boost to Windows 11 is part of sweeping changes coming to the operating system to improve performance, reliability, and user experience. Microsoft has also started removing “unnecessary” Copilot buttons from Windows 11, and made Windows Update a lot less annoying.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

  • Tom Warren

Most Popular

May 11, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Circle raises $222 million from BlackRock, Apollo and others in Arc token presale valued at $3 billion
Economy

Circle raises $222 million from BlackRock, Apollo and others in Arc token presale valued at $3 billion

by admin May 11, 2026
written by admin

In this article

  • CRCL
  • BLSH
  • COIN
Follow your favorite stocksCREATE FREE ACCOUNT
Circle Internet Group Initial Public Offering at the New York Stock Exchange in New York City, U.S., June 5, 2025.
NYSE

Circle Internet Group has raised $222 million in the presale of Arc, the native token of its new blockchain, as the company looks to expand beyond its core business of issuing the USDC stablecoin, CNBC has learned.

Andreessen Horowitz served as the lead investor in the raise with a $75 million investment. Other investors include BlackRock, Apollo Funds, New York Stock Exchange parent Intercontinental Exchange, SBI Group, Janus Henderson Investors, Standard Chartered Ventures, General Catalyst, Marshall Wace, ARK Invest, IDG Capital, Haun Ventures and the crypto exchange and CoinDesk owner Bullish.

The raise gives Arc a fully diluted network valuation of $3 billion.

“[Blockchain] infrastructure is becoming as important as mobile operating systems or cloud platforms,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told CNBC in an exclusive interview. “We want to build an operating system that has many, many stakeholders in it … major companies who are running the infrastructure with us and who ultimately help to govern it.”

“We’re becoming a broader internet platform company,” Allaire added. “We’re entering the operating system business and we’re doing it by building this multi-stakeholder distributed model with a token, with a distributed network. But it is an operating system business. And we’re also getting into the apps business.”

Arc is a public blockchain designed for institutional finance. Allaire emphasized it’s about more than stablecoins and payments — noting it can “run the actual economy.”

“The economy is not just representations of values, it’s every contract that undergirds those financial relationships … the systems of governance that we use to govern all these economic institutions,” Allaire said.

As a 25% stakeholder in Arc’s initial supply of 10 billion tokens, Circle can participate in operating validator infrastructure, generating new fee revenue and earning staking income. The majority of the tokens, 60%, will go to participants who build on, use and contribute to the Arc network. The remaining 15% will be allocated to a long-term reserve.

Investors should follow transactions, asset issuance and success on the network found by the developer community, Allaire said.

He added that the economy is becoming increasingly machine-operated, with AI agents handling more of the operational and contractual work currently managed by humans.

“We’re entering this era where software machines will power the economic system,” he said. “Software will do most of the work — that is what AI agents represent.”

The company also unveiled a set of services and tools designed to help developers build AI agents that can manage transactions, access online services and make payments using USDC.

Positioning for a more competitive market

Circle’s ambitions with Arc reflect the existential shift other crypto firms are facing: They need to evolve beyond the businesses that were built in crypto’s early days around the speculative cycles of cryptocurrencies, and toward more durable businesses with steadier and more diversified revenue.

“While USDC has become the trusted digital dollar for banks, corporations, and financial
institutions seeking the speed of crypto without its volatility, there remains a problem. The internet infrastructure which USDC runs on today wasn’t built with big institutions in mind. It was built for individuals and crypto enthusiasts. That’s where Arc comes in,” a16z crypto wrote in a blog post Monday morning.

If Arc is successful, it could allow Circle to own more of the infrastructure its flagship USDC stablecoin runs on. Today, USDC depends heavily on networks like Ethereum and Solana for settlement and distribution partners like Coinbase.

The initiative is as much about playing defense as it is about growth. While regulation supporting stablecoins legitimizes them – including the GENIUS Act signed into law last year and the STABLE Act, which is set to get an initial vote this week in the Senate Banking Committee – some investors worry banks and fintechs may launch their own competing dollar tokens, removing the need for a third-party issuer.

The on-chain capital raise

Circle is the first publicly listed company to conduct a token presale – an early sale of digital tokens before a blockchain project officially launches.

Crypto companies like token sales for their ability to raise large amounts of capital and build an early user community. They are frequently likened to IPOs since both represent public-facing fundraising mechanisms that result in a transferable financial interest.

Also known as “initial coin offerings,” or ICOs, token sales became notorious for their role in fueling the 2017 crypto peak – when the market grew so quickly that projects launched with little oversight, leading to some high-profile failures and scams.

The landscape has shifted significantly since then. Under the Trump administration’s more crypto-friendly regulatory posture, the Securities and Exchange Commission is increasingly focused on establishing frameworks for compliant tokenized securities and on-chain capital formation, creating conditions that could encourage the return of ICO-style fundraising in a more mature and sustainable structure.

“It is a major shift in how stakeholders can participate in the growth of networks,” Allaire said. “Every company in the world, over time, will be tokenized, meaning your shares will be tokens … [and] you will use digital tokens as mechanisms of engagement with your customers and stakeholders.”

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

May 11, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Trump calls Iran response to US proposal to end war 'totally unacceptable'
Global

Trump calls Iran response to US proposal to end war ‘totally unacceptable’

by admin May 10, 2026
written by admin

Iran’s semi-official Tasnim news agency said Tehran’s proposal, sent via Pakistan, which has served as a mediator, included an immediate end to the war on all fronts, a halt to the US naval blockade of Iranian ports and guarantees of no further attacks on Iran.

May 10, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Do you take after your dad’s RNA?
Tech/AI

Do you take after your dad’s RNA?

by admin May 10, 2026
written by admin

Until recently, however, most evidence linking small sperm RNAs to environmental challenges and subsequent effects in offspring has been correlational. Attempts to pin down causality—by injecting RNAs directly into embryos—have often used far higher RNA concentrations than typically found in sperm. In fact, there was no proof that the RNA fragments even make it inside the egg.

But though puzzles remain, recent studies show that not only are paternal RNA fragments transferred to a fertilized egg, but also that they are capable of inducing changes in the offspring at the doses found in sperm.

Epigenetic effects

Researchers first noticed the intergenerational effects of paternal lifestyle back in the 1960s, but it was decades before they started experimental investigations using animal models. Today, those studying the phenomenon are sure the effects exist but aren’t certain how they are transmitted. The end result, they believe, is adjustments to the activity of genes—a phenomenon known as epigenetics.

Such adjustments occur during normal development as tissues and organs adopt their different identities, which require certain genes to be active or to be turned off. Epigenetic changes also occur throughout our lives, due to factors including exposures to certain chemicals, and activities such as smoking—and, maybe, exercise, stress, fatty diets, and more. Such changes can occur in myriad body cells, including those that give rise to sperm.

As evidence mounted that sperm somehow transmit environmental information to a male’s children, researchers started probing the epigenetic mechanisms that might be responsible. Several possibilities exist: methyl groups that turn down gene activity when they accumulate on genes, and acetyl groups that attach to the protein spools called histones, around which the DNA wraps. These tend to ramp up activity of nearby genes.

May 10, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Vivo’s X300 Ultra has the best cameras in any phone
Tech/AI

Vivo’s X300 Ultra has the best cameras in any phone

by admin May 10, 2026
written by admin

While rivals push experimental telephotos, Vivo’s phone simply has three equally excellent cameras.

May 10, 2026, 11:00 AM UTC
vivo-x300-ultra-8
vivo-x300-ultra-8
Dominic Preston
Dominic Preston is a news editor with over a decade’s experience in journalism. He previously worked at Android Police and Tech Advisor.

A few months ago, I wrote that the telephoto camera is the only lens that matters any more, at least when it comes to Ultra-class flagships. As phones got better, cameras became where manufacturers tried to stand out. As cameras got better, telephoto lenses became the next point of focus. The most recent Ultra phones from Xiaomi, Oppo, and Huawei have all made the telephoto, above all, their selling point. Vivo’s X300 Ultra is doing something different.

Instead of pushing its telephoto hardware to further extremes, Vivo has mostly left it be. The company has focused its efforts on a significantly improved 35mm main camera, unique among the competition for its narrow, natural focal length. Combined with the best ultrawide camera in any phone and new pro-level video features, the result is a camera system that feels equally balanced between all three rear lenses. It’s a less flashy approach, but the total package is more versatile and useful than its rivals and my favorite to use so far.

Photo of the Vivo X300 Ultra laying on a gray stone bench.Photo of the Vivo X300 Ultra laying on a gray stone bench.

8

Verge Score

The Good

  • Fantastic rear cameras
  • Big battery
  • 144Hz display

The Bad

  • Bland, boring design
  • Rivals have better telephotos
  • OriginOS needs improvement

The main camera is certainly the best of the three. The 200-megapixel, 1/1.12-inch-type Sony Lytia 901 sensor delivers a serious jump in both size and resolution from last year’s X200 Ultra. But it preserves that camera’s best feature: a 35mm-equivalent focal length. That’s narrower than most other phones — 23–26mm is typical — but closer to what photographers tend to look for in their default lens because it feels natural, close in scope to the human eye. It’s also closer to the focal length many phones used to use. If you’ve ever lamented the fact that your main camera feels more and more like an ultrawide, this is the phone for you.

The telephoto camera also has 200-megapixel resolution, with an 85mm focal length and 1/1.4-inch sensor, essentially the same specs as the X200 Ultra. The slightly narrower f/2.7 aperture might make the X300 look like a downgrade, but improved stabilization and sensor and processing tweaks give this iteration an edge overall.

Then there’s the ultrawide. This also hasn’t changed much year over year, but remains unique for its sensor size. It’s larger than the one on the iPhone 17 Pro’s main camera and supports optical image stabilization too. It’s in every sense a main camera spec with an ultrawide lens on top. No other ultrawide comes close.

The selfie camera is the only one that isn’t especially impressive: a 50-megapixel shooter with a comparatively small 1/2.76-inch sensor. It’s fine; the other cameras are great.

Photos across all three rear lenses are of remarkably comparable quality, in almost any lighting. About the only difference I could find is that the telephoto and ultrawide are more susceptible to motion blur when shooting fast subjects like cats or cars, and even then only when it’s dark. Otherwise, picking between the lenses feels like choosing the right focal length to frame a shot, without the usual worries about tradeoffs in quality. Photos are helped by naturalistic color-processing and a wide range of quite impressive film simulations. Vivo’s color science is my favorite in any phone, and this year is no exception.

Vivo hasn’t just focused on still photography. This year it’s doubled down on video, though the upgrades here are really targeted at professionals. You can now record 4K, 120fps, 10-bit Log video across all of the three rear lenses, can import custom 3D LUTs, and use a Pro Video shooting mode for full manual controls. If you don’t know what half of that means, you’re not alone! This stuff is beyond the needs of most of us, myself included.

Like rival Ultra phones, there’s also a set of camera add-ons and accessories. My colleague Allison Johnson has already spent time playing around with Vivo’s camera grip and separate 200mm and 400mm telephoto extender lenses, which can take extraordinary shots at range that no other phone could ever manage. While at MWC Barcelona 2026, I got to briefly play around with the custom SmallRig camera cage developed for the phone too, which squeezes stabilization, cooling, and a fill light into a pretty compact package. All of these are sold separately and play into Vivo’s claim that the X300 Ultra can be the base of a semi-professional camera system if you want it to.

This is a phone though, not just a camera, so I’d better talk about the rest of it too. For me the big letdown in the X300 Ultra is its drab design. My black model is a pretty dull-looking device, and while the two-tone effects on the green and white versions are better, neither is a patch on the camera-inspired aesthetics of the latest Xiaomi and Oppo phones. The X300 Ultra’s camera island is also exceptionally raised, almost as thick as the phone, and for some reason Vivo has also ditched the physical shutter button, which I miss.

Other specs are on a par with rival Ultra phones, but impressive compared to Apple and Samsung: a combined IP68 and IP69 protection rating, a colossal 6,600mAh silicon-carbon battery, and a 144Hz refresh rate for its 6.8-inch OLED display. Then there’s the standard flagship stuff, like the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset, up to 1TB storage and 16GB RAM, and a decent promise of five years of Android OS updates and seven years of security patches. The phone runs on Vivo’s OriginOS, much improved on its older software but still the weakest of the major players, with a bland design and too many preinstalled apps and ads.

Ultra flagships are as much tech demos as consumer products. They’re an excuse for phone companies not only to show off their technical abilities, but also to lay down a vision for what makes the “best” phone right now. As processors and displays and water-resistance ratings have coalesced into universal standards that have proved tricky to improve upon, it’s the cameras where manufacturers can set out their stalls. And Vivo’s pitch is clear: The best camera is the one that’s great across every lens, not just one or two.

As tech demos go, this feels like a pretty practical one, price aside. The X300 Ultra isn’t launching in either the US or UK, but is available across Asia, along with a handful of European countries including Spain, Italy, and Austria. Its €1,999 (about $2,340) price certainly isn’t cheap, and its photography accessories add on hundreds more, though it costs about the same as a 1TB iPhone 17 Pro Max in those same markets. It’s expensive, but for what you’re getting, it probably should be.

I don’t think this is the best phone you could get for that money. It is a very good phone, with an excellent display, big battery, and flagship performance through and through. But the design is bulky, and boring, and maybe just a bit ugly. Vivo’s software often annoys me too. Xiaomi’s 17 Ultra is a slightly better all-round package, with a striking design and more polished OS. But the X300 Ultra’s three extraordinary lenses are so consistent, and so consistently excellent, that when I use the camera all those other worries fall away.

If I was putting my own money down right now, I’d buy the Xiaomi. But if I just had to pick who’s winning this year’s Ultra camera contest, Vivo gets my vote.

Photography by Dominic Preston / The Verge

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

  • Dominic Preston
  • Phone Reviews

Most Popular

May 10, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Why Canada is seeing its biggest military recruitment surge in 30 years
Global

Why Canada is seeing its biggest military recruitment surge in 30 years

by admin May 9, 2026
written by admin

Richard Shimooka, a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, a public policy think tank, said the Canadian Armed Forces currently have the capacity to deploy only a few thousand soldiers at a time, along with a limited number of fighter jets. By comparison, the UK military can deploy 10,000 troops if necessary, he said.

May 9, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Why one of the nation's largest auto lenders isn't worried about high vehicle prices or 'forever loans'
Economy

Why one of the nation’s largest auto lenders isn’t worried about high vehicle prices or ‘forever loans’

by admin May 9, 2026
written by admin

In this article

  • COF
Follow your favorite stocksCREATE FREE ACCOUNT
Used cars are offered for sale at a dealership on July 11, 2023 in Chicago, Illinois.
Scott Olson | Getty Images

The head of one of the nation’s largest auto finance lenders isn’t overly concerned about rising consumer automotive debt and inflated used car prices leading to longer loans on vehicle purchases.

His main reasoning? The percentage of income consumers are spending on their vehicles has remained relatively flat compared with 2019, before the coronavirus pandemic led to inflated pricing as demand surged but inventories stayed low.

“If I just told you, ‘Car prices going up, interest rates going up, insurance prices going up,’ you would say, ‘You know what, consumers must be paying more as a ratio to the income,'” Capital One Auto President Sanjiv Yajnik told CNBC. “However, if you look at every quintile of salary and earnings of people, the payment-to-income ratio has remained fairly flat.”

While Capital One reports median monthly car ownership payments have jumped from $390 to $525 since 2019, data provided exclusively to CNBC from its automotive unit suggest that vehicle costs have stayed relatively stable compared with income. That’s because, overall, the payment-to-income ratio has remained flat at approximately 10% since 2019, according to the automotive arm of the American bank.

Capital One Auto found 80% of car purchasers who finance a vehicle are below the generally recognized payment to income threshold of 15%.

“The consumer is being cautious. They’re being responsible. This is a much healthier way to do things than the alternative, because it’s not a discretionary spend,” said Yajnik, referring to consumers prioritizing vehicle payments for transportation, including work.

To get to that goal, however, more consumers are taking on longer loans to keep payments affordable.

The auto finance veteran’s view contrasts with others in the industry who view the longer term loans as a detriment to consumers’ pocketbooks.

They argue that so-called “forever loans” of six years or more have led to many buyers, particularly of new vehicles, being underwater on the equity of their cars and trucks. That means they owe more than their vehicle is worth when they decide to trade it in.

Edmunds reports roughly 26% of used vehicles purchased that involved a trade-in vehicle had negative equity this year through April. The amount of negative equity averaged $5,105, a 35% increase from 2019.

“As loan term lengths increase on average, the pace at which consumers make progress paying down their balance slows,” Jessica Caldwell, head of insights for CarMax‘s Edmunds, wrote in a recent online post. “If consumers then trade in their vehicle too soon for any reason, they are increasingly left holding more loan debt.”

Regarding financing for new vehicles during the first quarter, 90.2% of new vehicle loans involving trade-ins with negative equity carried terms of at least 72 months, and 43% extended to 84 months, according to Caldwell. The average negative equity trade-in was $7,183 during the quarter for new vehicles, according to Edmunds.

Those figures have been climbing since 2022, when inflated used vehicle values caused by a pandemic-fueled chip shortage insulated more shoppers from carrying debt into their next vehicle.

Consumers need to keep their vehicles for more time to make the long loans worth it, according to Yajnik. But that can also cause increases in maintenance costs as well as the likelihood that a vehicle needs repairs that exceed its value or has to be scrapped altogether.

“Yes, it takes longer to get your equity, but in the meantime, you get a use of the car, and you’re earning money,” said Yajnik, a 28-year veteran of Capital One who has led the automotive lending division since 2008.

The average listed price of a used vehicle was $25,390 in March, according to Cox’s most recent data. That compares to new vehicles, which depreciate faster, at $48,667.

Cox Automotive reports if all other things are equal on a loan, financing for a $30,000 vehicle at a 9% annual percentage rate would cost $3,100 more on an 84-month term than a 48-month loan. However, there’s a $264 difference in the monthly payments, which Yajnik said makes it more affordable for many consumers, especially those in lower income brackets.

“There’s obviously going to be pockets that have problems, but one has to start from a different place, which is, for which reason are people buying cars, and are they doing so irrationally?” Yajnik said.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

May 9, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Anger and resignation in Tenerife as hantavirus ship approaches
Global

Anger and resignation in Tenerife as hantavirus ship approaches

by admin May 8, 2026
written by admin

It will not dock directly in Tenerife but will instead anchor out at sea and its passengers will be ferried to the vast industrial port of Granadilla, in the south-east of the island, well away from residential areas. Soon after their arrival they will be repatriated, or, in the case of the 14 Spaniards aboard, taken to Madrid to be quarantined.

May 8, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Musk v. Altman week 2: OpenAI fires back, and Shivon Zilis reveals that Musk tried to poach Sam Altman
Tech/AI

Musk v. Altman week 2: OpenAI fires back, and Shivon Zilis reveals that Musk tried to poach Sam Altman

by admin May 8, 2026
written by admin

In the second week of the landmark trial between Elon Musk and OpenAI, Musk’s motivations for bringing the suit were under scrutiny.

Last week, Musk took the stand, alleging that OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and president Greg Brockman had deceived him into donating $38 million to the company. He claimed that they’d promised to maintain it as a nonprofit dedicated to developing AI for the benefit of humanity, only to later accept billions of dollars of investment from Microsoft and restructure the company to operate a for-profit subsidiary.  

This week, Brockman fired back with his side of the story, arguing that Musk had actually pushed for OpenAI to create a for-profit arm and fought a bitter battle to have “absolute control” over it. OpenAI has argued that Musk is suing because he didn’t get his way and is now trying to undermine a competitor to his own AI company, xAI.

Shivon Zilis, a former OpenAI board member and the mother of four of Musk’s children, also testified, revealing that Musk tried to recruit OpenAI CEO Sam Altman to lead a new AI lab at his electric-car company, Tesla. 

Musk cofounded OpenAI in 2015 with Altman, Brockman, and others but left in 2018. Now, he’s asking the court to remove Altman and Brockman from their roles and to unwind the restructuring OpenAI undertook last year, which converted its for-profit subsidiary into a public benefit corporation. He is also seeking as much as $134 billion in damages from OpenAI and Microsoft, OpenAI’s investor. 

The outcome of the trial could upend OpenAI’s race toward an IPO at a valuation approaching $1 trillion. Meanwhile, xAI, which Musk founded in 2023, is now a division of his rocket company, SpaceX; the combined companies are also expected to go public as early as June, at a target valuation of $1.75 trillion.

On Monday, Brockman walked into the courtroom in a blue suit and tie, holding hands with his wife, Anna Brockman. On the stand, he was serene, even chipper, as he recalled OpenAI’s early days. But he grew agitated under impassioned questioning from Elon Musk’s lawyer, Steven Molo. Altman listened in silence, while Anna Brockman sat behind him, fidgeting. Outside the courthouse, protesters rallying against the AI race sang hymns over the voices of lawyers giving press conferences.

Two days before trial began, according to Brockman, Musk messaged him to ask if he would be interested in settling. When Brockman suggested that both sides drop their claims, Musk texted back: “By the end of this week, you and Sam will be the most hated men in America. If you insist, so it will be.”

Musk stormed out with a Tesla painting

Last week, Musk testified that he’s suing to save OpenAI’s nonprofit mission to develop AI safely, but he said he was open to seeing OpenAI become a capped-profit company with moderate investments from Microsoft. 

This week, Brockman told the jury that Musk was never truly committed to keeping OpenAI a nonprofit. In the summer of 2017, when an AI model that OpenAI built beat the world’s best players in a video game called Dota 2, Musk hosted a gathering at his “Haunted Mansion” near San Francisco. The house was splattered with confetti and cups, Brockman recalled, and the actress Amber Heard, who was Musk’s girlfriend at the time, served whiskey.

“Time to make the next step for OpenAI. This is the triggering event,” Musk wrote in an email—having said weeks earlier that if OpenAI made a major public achievement, it would be “time to create a for-profit,” Brockman told the jury.

Over the next six weeks, Brockman said, Musk and the other cofounders had intense discussions about creating a for-profit entity to raise enough capital to build artificial general intelligence—powerful AI that can compete with humans on most cognitive tasks. Musk wanted to have majority equity in the entity and the right to choose a majority of the board members. He also wanted to be its CEO, said Brockman. 

Brockman testified that in August 2017, he and other cofounders gathered to hash out the terms of the for-profit structure. Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI’s chief scientist at the time, arrived bearing a painting of a Tesla as a “token of goodwill” in return for the actual Teslas Musk had given them days earlier. “It felt a little bit like [Musk] was buttering us up, right,that he wanted us to feel indebted to him,” Brockman told the jury.

When Brockman and Sutskever proposed that they all have equal shares of equity, said Brockman, Musk fell silent and finally said, “I decline.” Musk then stood up and “stormed around the table,” he said. “I actually thought he was going to hit me.” Musk grabbed the painting and walked out. 

Brockman said that afterwards he struggled to decide whether to continue building OpenAI with Musk or break away. “There was a fork in the road,” he said. “Do we accept Elon’s terms? Or do we reject the terms, he quits to create his own, and then we create our own?”

“The one thing we could not accept was to hand him unilateral, absolute control, potentially, over the AGI,” Brockman told the jury.

What was Brockman thinking?

In his theatrical baritone, Molo argued that Brockman was motivated by greed rather than a commitment to OpenAI’s nonprofit mission to develop AI that benefits humanity. He noted that while Brockman never invested money in the company, he now owns a stake worth close to $30 billion. 

“Solving for the mission has always been my primary motivation,” Brockman said, pushing back on Molo’s characterization of him. “It remains so today.” 

Molo pulled up Brockman’s electronic journal on a screen in the courtroom, trying to show the jury what Brockman was really thinking behind the scenes. In 2017, while negotiating with Musk about the future of OpenAI, Brockman wrote about wanting to become a billionaire: “Financially what will take me to $1B?” 

“Why didn’t you take the $29 billion and donate it to the nonprofit that you had a fiduciary duty to, for the good of humanity?” Molo asked Brockman, raising his voice to dramatize moral indignation. 

Molo then pulled up a journal entry Brockman had written in November 2017, while he was torn over whether to turn OpenAI into a for-profit without Musk: “it’d be wrong to steal the nonprofit from him. to convert to a b-corp without him. that’d be pretty morally bankrupt.” Brockman and Musk had previously considered creating a b-corp, which is a for-profit company that pursues a social mission.

Brockman explained, “I meant it would actually serve the mission, but it’d be hard to look at yourself in the mirror.”

Molo also tried to undermine Brockman’s credibility by revealing that he holds a stake in multiple companies with business ties to OpenAI, including the AI company Cerebras, the cloud provider CoreWeave, and the nuclear fusion startup Helion Energy. Altman has tried to steer OpenAI into deals with companies that he invests in, including Helion and the rocket maker Stoke Space, drawing scrutiny over potential conflicts of interest.

Former OpenAI chief technology officer Mira Murati and former OpenAI board member Helen Toner both appeared in video depositions. They addressed the brief firing of Altman in 2023, saying that they could not trust him because of his alleged history of lying. Murati’s text messages with Altman from that time, which were introduced as evidence, revealed his desperate attempts to understand what was happening and regain control. 

Musk plotted a rival AI lab at Tesla

After Brockman’s two days of testimony, Shivon Zilis, who left OpenAI’s board in 2023, took the stand in a black jacket and black jeans, appearing composed but with a flicker of nerves. OpenAI’s lawyer Sarah Eddy asked her in a deceptively soothing voice whether she acted as a conduit for Musk as he tried to poach OpenAI’s cofounders to work at a new AI lab within Tesla. Eddy argued that Musk is suing OpenAI only to undermine a competitor in the AI race. 

Zilis said she met Musk while working at OpenAI as an informal advisor in 2016, and that they had a “one-off” romantic encounter. In 2017, she joined Tesla and Musk’s brain-implant company, Neuralink. In 2020, she joined OpenAI’s board of directors. She became pregnant with Musk’s children through IVF but did not disclose her ties with Musk to OpenAI until Business Insider reported them in 2022. 

By late 2017, Musk had concluded that OpenAI was unlikely to build AGI and pivoted to building an AI lab at Tesla, according to an email sent to Zilis. 

Eddy pulled up a draft of an FAQ document that Zilis emailed a colleague at Tesla in 2017 about an event the company was organizing at the NeurIPS AI conference: “The purpose of this event is to share that Tesla is building a world leading AI lab(?) which will rival the likes of Google/DeepMind and Facebook AI Research.” 

Zilis told the jury that when Musk was still on OpenAI’s board, he tried to recruit Altman to lead that prospective AI lab. Musk had asked Andrej Karpathy, an OpenAI research scientist he’d recruited to work at Tesla, “to send a list of top OpenAI people to poach,” according to a text message by Zilis. 

“There is little chance of OpenAI being a serious force if I focus on TeslaAI,” Musk texted Zilis in 2018, just before he left OpenAI. Tesla’s AI lab never came to fruition.

Eddy pressed Zilis about whom she was loyal to when she was working for OpenAI and Musk at the same time. “I had an allegiance to the best outcome for AI for humanity,” Zilis told the jury.

What’s going on next week?

Next week, Ilya Sutskever will testify, as will Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella. The lawyers for both Musk and OpenAI will deliver their closing arguments. The jury will begin deliberating the week after and deliver an advisory verdict guiding the judge to decide the case.

This story is part of MIT Technology Review’s ongoing coverage of the Musk v. Altman trial. Follow @techreview or @michelletomkim on X for up-to-the-minute reporting.

May 8, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Manufacturing qubits that can move
Tech/AI

Manufacturing qubits that can move

by admin May 8, 2026
written by admin

Like any other manufactured chip, the wiring that connects the quantum dots is locked into place during the chip’s manufacture. Since different error correction schemes require different connections among the qubits, this forces us to commit to specific error-correction schemes during manufacturing. If a better scheme is developed after a chip is made, it’s probably not possible to switch to it. Less complex algorithms may benefit from simpler error-correction schemes that require less overhead, but we wouldn’t be able to switch schemes with these chips.

So, quantum dots appear to typify the trade-offs that we’re facing with quantum computing: it’s easier for us to make lots of quantum dots and all the hardware needed to manipulate them, but it’s seemingly not possible for them to benefit from the flexibility that other types of qubits have.

The whole point of this new paper is to show that this isn’t necessarily true.

Moveable dots

The new work was done in collaboration between researchers at Delft University of Technology and the startup QuTech. The team built a chip that had a linear array of quantum dots, and they started out with single electron spins at each end. Then, with the appropriate electrical signals, they could shift the spins into the net dot, gradually bringing them closer together. (And, by gradually, we mean a fraction of a second here, but relatively slowly compared to basic switching in electronics.)

Once the electrons were close enough, the spin wavefunctions overlapped, allowing the researchers to perform two-qubit gates on them. These manipulations can be used to entangle the two spins and are thus needed to build error-corrected logical qubits; these gates are also needed for performing calculations.

The researchers then confirmed that they could move the electrons back to their starting positions, after which measurements confirmed that their spins were entangled. And since quantum teleportation also requires a two-qubit gate, they showed that the process could be used for teleportation. Teleportation can enhance the sort of mobility provided by moving the qubits around, since it can be used to move states around after the qubits have been widely separated.

May 8, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Follow Us

Recent Posts

  • Windows 11 is getting a macOS-like speed boost

    May 11, 2026
  • Circle raises $222 million from BlackRock, Apollo and others in Arc token presale valued at $3 billion

    May 11, 2026
  • Trump calls Iran response to US proposal to end war ‘totally unacceptable’

    May 10, 2026
  • Do you take after your dad’s RNA?

    May 10, 2026
  • Vivo’s X300 Ultra has the best cameras in any phone

    May 10, 2026

Newsletter

Join the BusinessStory newsletter for fresh insights, market analysis, and new stories!

Categories

  • Business (18)
  • Economy (425)
  • Global (444)
  • Investing (8)
  • Lifestyle (114)
  • Tech/AI (1,186)
  • Uncategorized (10)

Our Company

We’re dedicated to telling true stories from all around the world.

  • Ilulissat 3952, Greenland
  • Phone: (686) 587 6876
  • Email: [email protected]
  • Support: [email protected]

About Links

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Advertise With Us
  • Media Relations
  • Corporate Information
  • Compliance
  • Apps & Products

Useful Links

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Closed Captioning Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Personal Information
  • Data Tracking
  • Register New Account

Newsletter

Join the BusinessStory newsletter for fresh insights, market analysis, and new stories!

Latest Posts

Vivo’s X300 Ultra has the best cameras in any phone
Why Canada is seeing its biggest military recruitment surge in 30 years
Why one of the nation’s largest auto lenders isn’t worried about high vehicle prices or ‘forever loans’
Anger and resignation in Tenerife as hantavirus ship approaches

@2025 – All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by BusinessStory.org

Facebook Twitter Instagram Linkedin Youtube Email
  • Home
  • Investing
  • Global
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Tech/AI
  • Lifestyle
  • About Us
  • Contact