Journalists frequently pose inquiries to global leaders.
Nothing unusual about that. Correct?
Yet, what does it entail to direct a question at Vladimir Putin – the president who instigated the comprehensive invasion of Ukraine, the ruler whose nation was implicated this week by the chief of MI6 for “spreading chaos”?
And consider the prospect of asking that question live on television while millions of Russians are tuned in.
It’s a significant duty. You want to avoid any blunders.
“My inquiry regards Russia’s future. What vision do you have for your nation and its citizens?” I pose to President Putin.
“Is the future going to mirror the present, where any public dissent against the official stance is subject to legal repercussions? Will the search for domestic and international adversaries be intensified? Will we see more frequent mobile internet disruptions? Will there be additional ‘special military operations’?”
As I am speaking, Vladimir Putin is jotting down notes. Then he responds.
He justifies Russia’s stringent foreign agent legislation. Hundreds of Russians who criticize the government have been labeled as “foreign agents.”
“We didn’t invent it,” Putin conveys to me.
“This [foreign agent] legislation was enacted in various Western nations, including America in the 1930s. Moreover, all such laws, including the American one, are considerably harsher…”
In truth, the Russian regulation is severe. It bars “foreign agents” from numerous areas of public engagement, including education, civil service, elections, and public gatherings. It imposes financial and property limitations, with potential criminal charges following a single administrative penalty.
Nevertheless, I cannot highlight this to President Putin. The microphone was removed from me once I had completed my question.
Abruptly, the moderator steps in to shift the topic.
“There’s another question here: ‘What will happen to the BBC? It’s facing a multi-billion lawsuit from the US president?’,” states anchor Pavel Zarubin.
“I believe President Trump is correct,” President Putin agrees.
The Kremlin and the White House align… regarding the BBC.
Putin comes back to my inquiry.
“Will there be new special military operations? There won’t be, if you approach us with respect, acknowledging our interests, just as we have constantly strived to do with you. Unless you deceive us, as you did with NATO’s eastern expansion.”
Evident for all to observe is what motivates Vladimir Putin – a profound resentment towards the West.
He asserts that for years, Western leaders have disrespected, deceived, and lied to Russia – and that they continue to do so by asserting that Moscow intends to assault Europe. “What kind of nonsense is that?” proclaims the Kremlin leader.
Yet many European leaders simply lack trust in Moscow.
Ahead of the comprehensive Russian invasion of Ukraine, Russian officials claimed they did not have plans for a large-scale assault.
More recently, Russia has been accused of breaching European airspace with fighter jets and drones, as well as executing cyber-attacks and acts of sabotage.
However, as he wrapped up his answer to my question, was this a gesture of goodwill towards Europe from the Russian president?
“We are prepared to halt hostilities immediately, provided that Russia’s medium- and long-term security is guaranteed, and we are willing to collaborate with you.”
However, if Moscow keeps tying its long-term security to its maximalist expectations concerning Ukraine, European leaders will persist in their skepticism.












